The Report of the Palestine Partition Commission
The Report of the Palestine Partition Commission
Key takeaways
Bibliography: Woodhead, S.J., 1939. The Report of the Palestine Partition Commission. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1931-1939) 26.
Authors:: Sir John Woodhead
Collections:: Arab-Israeli Conflict
First-page:
content: "@woodheadReportPalestinePartition1939" -file:@woodheadReportPalestinePartition1939
Reading notes
-
Plan of partition relating to the Royal Commission called Plan A
-
Boundary of Jerusalem had to be extended north
-
Changes had to be made south of the Jewish state to provide a defensive barrier
-
Followed roughly however from the Royal commissions outline
-
Problem created by a large Arab minority would be a serious hinderance to partition
-
Via irrigation and transfer of persons by force if necessary
-
Government had however said they had not accepted a proposal for compulsory transfer and the Jewish voices also agreed with this…
-
Voluntary Arab transfer would not be possible
-
Even if land transfer were possible, irrigation of the land is impossible to support the levels required
-
Galilee must be excluded from a Jewish state due to the overwhelming population of Arabs
-
Next step was to examine Plan B
-
Include galilee not under a Jewish state
-
Jewish state would be vulnerable to attack through this however
-
Same for acre and Haifa, both had to be in the same hands
-
Galilee could not be included in an Arab state either
-
Plan C
-
Palestine falls under three parts
-
Northern galilee under a mandate
-
Arab state
-
Jewish state
-
Economic sphere, acquisition of agricultural land has caused the most resentment among arabs
-
The capital that Jews can control will see more and more land come under Jewish authority
-
Jewish land purchases under the mandate area ought to be controlled
-
Northern area- any purchase of land from a Non-Jew to a Jew ought to be prohibited
-
10 year expiry date
-
Special provision ought be in place for Jewish migration under plan C
-
Annual surplus of the Jewish state would be around £600,000
-
Arab state a deficit of £550,000
-
Mandate state a deficit of £450,000
-
Average per capita brings the other two states down with Jews having a much higher GDP per capita compared to Arabs
-
The greater part of the Arab wealth of Palestine lies outside the Arab state such as the citrus farms