Class inequality and meritocracy: A critique of Saunders and an alternative analysis

(1999) - Richard Breen, John H Goldthorpe

Journal: Brit. Jnl. of Sociology
Link::
DOI::
Links::
Tags:: #paper #NCDS #Tenure #SocialClass
Cite Key:: [@breenClassInequalityMeritocracy1999]

Abstract

Saunders’ recent work claiming that contemporary British society is to a large extent ‘meritocratic’ is criticized on conceptual and technical grounds. A reanalysis of the National Child Development Study data-set, used by Saunders, is presented. This reveals that while merit, de ned in terms of ability and effort, does play a part in determining individuals’ class destinations, the effect of class origins remains strong. Children of less advantaged class origins need to show substantially more merit than children from more advantaged origins in order to gain similar class positions. These differences in ndings to some extent arise from the correction of biases introduced by Saunders; but there are also features of his own results, consistent with those reported in the reanalysis, which he appears not to have fully appreciated.

Notes

“This reveals that while merit, deŽned in terms of ability and effort, does play a part in determining individuals’ class destinations, the effect of class origins remains strong.” (Breen and Goldthorpe, 1999, p. 1)

“ildren of less advantaged class origins need to show substantially more merit than children from more advantaged origins in order to gain similar class positions.” (Breen and Goldthorpe, 1999, p. 1)